A year of upsets in domestic cricket
Mumbai, Tamil Nadu, Hyderabad, Karnataka and Delhi eliminated
Partab Ramchand
24-Dec-2001
Mumbai, Tamil Nadu, Hyderabad, Karnataka and Delhi eliminated. Railways
and Orissa in the semifinals. Baroda emerging champions. To say that the
2000-2001 Ranji Trophy season was full of surprises would be a gross
understatement.
There were a few upset results in the league stage. In the knockout
stages, however, where the men are generally separated from the boys, it
was thought that the big guns would be there at the finish. But some
surprise results led to a rather strange situation in which none of the
four semifinalists of the 1999-2000 season - champions Mumbai, runnersup Hyderabad, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka - made it to the last four.
The pre-quarterfinals were not without their own share of unexpected
happenings. Karnataka had to bounce back after conceding a slim first
innings lead to Assam. Railways upset Maharashtra at Pune. Madhya
Pradesh defeating Hyderabad was also a minor surprise. But not many
would have expected the shock results to spill over to the
quarterfinals. The biggest surprise of the year's competition came at
this stage when Punjab humbled 34-time champions Mumbai on their home
turf at the Wankhede stadium. Railways, as if to prove that their
victory over Maharashtra was no fluke, then got the better of six-time
champs Karnataka. And finally, Orissa scored over Madhya Pradesh at
Gwalior.
All these unusual results left a most unlikely pairing for the
penultimate rounds - Baroda vs Orissa at Baroda and Railways vs Punjab
at Mohali. The upsets did not end even at this late stage, with Railways
getting the better of hotly fancied Punjab. Orissa, which entered the
semifinals for the first time, lost to Baroda, but it was a season to
remember for the little-fancied eastern state that topped the East Zone
points table by a long way. Much of the credit for their improved
showing went to two Indian players Shiv Sunder Das and Debashish
Mohanty, who played inspirational roles.
The fact that Baroda and Railways contested the final in April was
indicative of changing trends. At the beginning of the season, the odds
against these two teams vying for the title would have been
astronomical. Railways had never won the trophy and had entered the
final only once - in 1987-88. Baroda had last won the trophy in 1957-58
and thereafter had never been serious contenders for the title. But it
was good that the Ranji Trophy was no more the prerogative of Bombay,
Delhi or Karnataka. The intense competition among teams is now bound to
augur well for the domestic game and, consequently, Indian cricket.
The Ranji Trophy final was an engrossing contest. Baroda were favoured
to win on home turf, but when they conceded the first-innings lead, it
seemed that the tournament would end with yet another major upset. But
Zaheer Khan delivered when it mattered most. The Indian left-arm seam
bowler picked up five wickets for just 16 runs on the fifth and final
day to ensure victory by 21 runs and the return of the Ranji Trophy to
Baroda for the first time in 43 years.
At the time of writing, the 2001-2002 Ranji Trophy championship is in
its initial phase. But a decision taken during the year by the Board of
Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), now more alive to the welfare of
the domestic circuit than in the past, is bound to have a far-reaching
effect on the game and the players. As in life, change is the essence of
cricket. The game must move with the times, and this is true not only of
international cricket but also of the domestic game.
From the 2002-2003 season, the premier national tournament will undergo
an almost revolutionary change in format, based on promotion and
relegation. The plan, as envisaged, is that the 15 teams which qualify
for the knock-out stages during the 2001-2002 season will be placed in
Division A, while the 12 who do not qualify will be placed in Division
B. After league matches between the competing teams in the two groups,
the two sides that finish at the bottom of Division A will be demoted
while the two top sides in Division B will earn promotion.
The plan of having two divisions along the lines of the English county
championship had been discussed for some time now. This was largely
because some of the matches at the zonal level have been hopelessly one
sided. It is hoped that the new format will serve as an added incentive
for the team and the players to perform well.
The National Cricket Academy, in its second year, made encouraging
progress. There was little doubt that its launch last year was one of
the best things to happen to Indian cricket, and the youngsters
benefited much by the systematic training programme. For the second year
running, three cricketers were sent under the Border-Gavaskar
scholarship for coaching at the Australian Academy in Adelaide. In
addition, zonal academies also started taking shape, and the South Zone
Academy was inaugurated in Chennai in May. Former Indian wicket-keeper
Syed Kirmani, the chief coach, made it clear, while speaking at the
inaugural function, that emphasis would be laid on fielding and physical
fitness, which he said was lacking amongst the cricketers in India.
A significant event off the field was former International Cricket
Council (ICC) chief Jagmohan Dalmiya taking over as president of the
BCCI. At Chennai in September, he defeated the incumbent AC Muthiah by
17 votes to 13 in a rather unexpected result. Muthiah was expected to
carry the day, having had a pretty good record to show over two years in
office. With a few exceptions, Board presidents have been elected for
three years. But Dalmiya, a wily and experienced campaigner, pulled off
an upset, although Muthiah's candidate Niranjan Shah won the election
for the secretary's post, defeating the incumbent Jaywant Lele.