10 December 1998
ACB bear brunt of the blame for 'cover-up'
By Christopher Martin-Jenkins in Adelaide
A RASH of righteous indignation broke out around Australia
yesterday when it became clear that there had been an official
cover-up over the connection of two national heroes to the
allegations of bribery and corruption in cricket.
Looking on the bright side... Shane Warne, left, and Mark Waugh
get their message acrossBlame seemed to be attaching itself less
to Shane Warne and Mark Waugh, for accepting money for passing on
basic cricketing information to an illegal bookmaker in Sri Lanka
in 1994, than to the Australian Cricket Board for keeping their
subsequent investigation a secret.
The belated disclosure that Waugh and Warne had been fined 10,000
and 8,000 Australian dollars respectively (£4,000 and £3,200) for
taking cash from an illegal bookmaker in Sri Lanka four years ago
has "damaged the high reputation of Australian cricket",
according to the ACB chief executive, Mal Speed, who was not in
office at the time.
Speaking after the two players had read out virtually identical
prepared statements before a packed media conference at the
Adelaide Oval, Speed admitted that, with hindsight, it would have
been better not to have kept the matter from the public,
particularly in the light of the two judicial inquiries in
Pakistan into alleged involvement by their players in
match-fixing for money. A judge in Lahore is expected to make his
report to the President of Pakistan on Tuesday week.
Mark Waugh was not asked about his own acceptance of money, nor
did he disclose it, when he gave evidence to Justice Malik
Mohammed Qayuum in Lahore two months ago during Australia's tour
of Pakistan. Waugh repeated evidence he had given four years
earlier that the then Pakistan captain, Salim Malik, had offered
him $200,000 (£121,000) to play badly in a one-day international
on the 1994 tour.
The amounts involved in alleged match-fixing were far in excess
of the sums which Waugh and Warne received, respectively £2,400
and £2,000, for giving information about weather and pitch
conditions to a bookmaker based in Delhi. The two players
completely denied giving anything less than their best for
Australia in any match or even divulging team tactics or who
would be selected. Speed added that they had also denied betting
on cricket.
According to a statement read out by Speed on behalf of Alan
Crompton, chairman of the ACB at the time of their inquiry into
rumours early in 1995, the players had voluntarily offered a full
account of what had happened when asked to do so. As one
journalist expressed it yesterday, "they were honest about being
dishonest". Waugh and Warne were told when they were fined that
they had been "naive and foolish in the extreme". Yesterday,
Nike, whose products Warne has promoted for three years at a
reported cost to the company of £500,000 a year, said they were
"considering their position".
Both players reaffirmed yesterday that the information they
provided, "on a handful of occasions", was "mundane, and exactly
the same as any pre-match media interview". It is easy to see how
tempting such money must have seemed. Speed, who said he knew
only the first name of the bookmaker involved, admitted that the
ACB had not attempted to track him down to see whether he would
deny or corroborate the evidence given by the two players.
A former cricketer, Salim Pervez, 51, who played in a single
one-day international for Pakistan in 1980, told the judge in
Lahore that he had paid Salim Malik and Mushtaq Ahmed $100,000 to
lose a match against Australia in the quadrangular tournament in
Sri Lanka in 1994, the same tournament in which it now transpires
the two Australians were given money for information.
Details of the board's findings were conveyed in confidence in
1995 to the International Cricket Council, whose chief executive,
David Richards, was formerly chief executive of the ACB. Since
then, these two organisations and the Pakistan Cricket Board have
tended to pass the buck to one another, but Speed said that the
whole issue of match-fixing, which he believes has now ceased,
will be on the agenda of the ICC at their next meeting in
Christchurch, New Zealand, in January. He promised greater
"transparency" in future over serious matters of discipline.
The world of cricket now awaits the verdict of Mr Justice Qayuum.
Whatever it is, there is likely to be a move to give the ICC more
formal powers to investigate any suggestion of corruption in
international matches. The very idea of it would once have seemed
totally absurd.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)